At 01:48 AM 8/24/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: >Hi! 23-á×Ç-2006 16:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) >wrote to [email protected]: >>HIMEM.EXE (HIMEM64 3.12) >crashes on "shl cx,4" even when invoked >>as "himem /?". MD> That's from >UPX. Why you don't use "--8086" option when packing?
Because the option is not listed unless you know to look for it as advanced option? Because I don't have an 8086 to test and until just now, nobody else on the list had one available, so it didn't matter? Because it still might not work ? Or, because it adds 13 bytes to each executable size? Not good enough? Probably not. I'll compress EMM386 with the option next time, but unless a person with an 8086 is available for pre-testing, it may not make a difference. Does anybody here have an 8086 and can act as a test subject in a reasonable turn-around time frame? Right now I'm just holding the minor NOALTBOOT change to see if anything else is needed before 1.0, so I'll --8086 the executable when it goes out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
