Yes, I also think so - it *is* time for version 1.0.

Bye
  Flo

Jim Hall wrote:
> Jim Hall wrote:
>> [...]
>> It's as though we're afraid of the "1.0" label, sort of asymptotically 
>> approaching "1.0" but never really getting there.
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> A lot of people probably wonder "why is '1.0' so important?"  I feel we 
> need to get "1.0" out there to draw a line in the sand, that we're at 
> least "1.0" quality.  We can do what MS-DOS could do.  Maybe we have a 
> few bugs, but what "1.0" software doesn't have bugs - people expect it.  
> But marking a "1.0" release means you can start to work on stuff after 
> "1.0": I really hoped we would be able to break out of the mould of 
> MS-DOS, and start to extend what DOS means.  FreeDOS-32 is along that 
> direction.  Multitasking, flat memory, etc.  I'd also like to see more 
> utilities to make it possible to replicate some of the advanced features 
> we take for granted in modern operating systems, such as Linux.
> 
> I guess I'm impatient to get there.
> 
> -jh
> 
> 

-- 
Florian Xaver <http://www.flox.at.tf>

Dr-DOS  Wiki <http://www.drdos.org>
oZone-a GUI operating system for DOS,Linux,Win
SWORD-a nice GUI library for DOS/DJGPP
<http://www.flox.at.tf>








Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to