Hi!
13-Июн-2006 14:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
[email protected]:
>> >> BC> Turbo C is an old compiler. In many instances, it conflicts with the
>> >> BC> C standard.
>> >> No, it not confilicts with C standard, And especially not in
question
>> >> of initialization of uninitialized static variables.
AM> I believe that the standard changed since Borland's DOS compilers. And
Yes, there was added many features since Turbo C times. But
initialization of uninitialized static variables rule wasn't changed.
AM> OW is upgrading to the standard
Yes, OW is more compliant to newer standards.
AM> OTOH, OW does not have all the Borland functions,
It have _no one_ Borland' function. "Borland" name for OW team has bad
reputation and there was/is no plans to support any compatibility level with
Borland's compilers. Only MS compilers compatibility somewhat supported.
AM> but it many people have written those. (inclusing some myself)
AFAIR, Blair offers to OW team some library functions, to increase
Borland compatibility. Don't know their current state.
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
