Hi Eduardo, Many thanks!! Great news both, as usual. :-))
Thanks, Aitor 2006/5/31, Eduardo Casino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Aitor Santamaría" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know the current status of NLSFUNC, but I think it is now > > using the same interface as MODE, which is good: for the final, the > > same kind of Generic IOCTL calls should be issued to ALL character > > device drivers (and not through the DISPLAY interrupt). > > Current version (0.2) uses the DISPLAY interrupt and ignores any other > driver. I have a working 0.3 version that checks for DISPLAY's version: if it > is < 1.0, uses the interrupt for display and then generic IOCTL for the rest > of char drivers; if it is >= 1.0, uses IOCTL for everything. I plan to > release it very soon. > > > PS: By the way, Eric, the NANSI bug is still open, and when DISPLAY > > 1.0 comes to light it might prevent DISPLAY.SYS and NLSFUNC to work > > properly. I reproduced the bug with MS-DOS. > > Eric, I sent you a fix long ago. Do you want me to re-send? > > Regards, > Eduardo > > > 2006/5/25, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, I have the impression that the > > > > http://freedos.sourceforge.net/freecom/FreeCOM.html#-status > > > > page is far too pessimistic: Even 0.82pl3 does support > > - wildcard rename > > - swap to XMS without helper app > > - supports redirect / pipe in the XMS swap version > > - did I miss other issues? > > So the only remaining missing 1.0 feature is: > > - int 2e support (run shell commands by sending them > > to the master shell through the int 2e interface, > > so you do not have to start a new shell instance) > > Plus some 1.0 wishes: > > - use own I/O library > > - optimize for size, improve modularization and code sharing > > between modules, do strict _doserrno error handling... > > - LFN support... > > > > - load parts of the shell to HMA (if I understand "DOS=HIGH support" right) > > > > Comments please - I would like to update the FreeCOM.html file > > when I can find the time, so please send me suggestions about > > what should be changed. Thanks! > > > > Eric > > > > PS: I think we should add 4DOS to the distro - it is not > > open source but it is distrobutable and free as far as I > > can tell. And I hope it supports int 2e... Does it...? > > > > PPS: We would also need somebody who can add some smaller > > bug really useful bugfixes to FDISK and DEFRAG and SYS, anybody? > > ^-- but > > > > (I hope MEM and NLSFUNC will be okay... maybe somebody even does PRINT(Q)?) > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! > > Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in > > the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Freedos-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! > Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in > the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid7521&bid$8729&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
