Johnson Lam schreef:
Hi,
Jack R. Ellis have message:
hi Jhonson, thanks for reporting Jack's email.
I guess he's silently reading the freedos mailinglists after all :)
(maybe only even through the sourceforge or freedos.org webmail system)
However, it's enough to keep this only on the developer list.
Thank you for Jack's advice on this matter. However a patch to EMM386
[ ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/emms204.zip ]
would be even more usefull :)
All kinds of help do help though, even strong advices.
Now let's hope that, because of no patches were contributed by other ppl
for this, Michael or Tom can develop a EMM386 patch on his own to
(partially?) implement the advice which Jack gave.
However, any incremental improvement would work for me :)
Narrowing down situations and test cases is also pretty important
afterall to continue development.
Let's see how EMM386 grows more and more mature. I think it's 95% to 98%
complete already.
testing VDS for normal users is pretty simple also:
First specify
DEVICE=HIMEM.EXE
DEVICE=EMM36.EXE VDS
DOS=HIGH,UMB
*Mark had a VOL C: (or DIR C:, or whatever which accesses harddisk)
*I tried DEVLOAD /H UDMA2.SYS in combination with EMM386,
with & without VDS parameter specified.
Getting detailed info on what's going on is however more difficult.
Bernd
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
