Hi,
----- Mensaje Original ----- Remitente: "Arkady V.Belousov" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destinatario: [email protected] Fecha: Mi�rcoles, Enero 12, 2005 2:12pm Asunto: Re: [Freedos-devel] Questions on EMM386 (part2 and last) >Hi! >4-���-2005 01:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamar�a Merino) >wrote to >[email protected]: >ASM> (1) This one is easy: >ASM> .486p >ASM> Does this mean to use 486-specific instructions (that is, not to >ASM> complain if one comes across 486-specific instructions)? > This one just _enables_ usage of protected mode ("p" suffix) >instructions of 486 (and all below) CPUs. >ASM> What happens in that case if I have a pure 386? > Nothing wrong, unless you use in your source some 486-specific >instruction and try to execute it on 386. > Note: cpu-type directives doesn't change source, they just >_enable_usage of cpu-specific instructions in your source. For >example, without .386 >I can't use 32-bit instructions in my source. Precisely. I just asked because I was afraid that some 486 specific opcode or opcode/operand combination was used. (I don't know much about the interface changes of 386+ processors). Aitor ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
