On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:22:54 +0200, you wrote: Hi,
>Sorry, but I strongly disagree. Unless there's a bug, I don't see many >differences between MEMA /C and MEMA /A, but it is true that NEITHER >resemble MS-MEM /C Actually I seldom use the traditional FreeDOS MEM (sorry guys) because MI show clearly the program layout without thinking (program resides in different column when loading high or low) >For example, blocks are not grouped (COMMAND program and environment, >e.g.), whereas MS-MEM /C provides a very neat table with grouped blocks. >(nor Bart's MEM /U, which is a bit similar but size is not listed in >decimal and blocks are not grouped either). I've no idea how to sort them, but hope you can advise some good layout >I am of course grateful to both of you and to everybody in general to >have a MEM, but one must recognise that both have little resemblance >with MS-MEM, and switches mismatch terribly... :-) For switches, I agree with you better follow M$ or just MEM show all (may be difficult since too many information) Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
