Bart, many thanks, you are absolutely right, I'll try and let you know.
tom ehlert escribi�:
Yes, actually I agree with you. For me it's more critical the fact that you can compile against a non-open source compiler rather than for a packer, that for me it's merely a media (no matter if they coexist in the same file).ASM> But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL ASM> if available
Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice (similar to choosing LINUX)
However, after rereading the *exact* GPL terms, I still consider an exepacker kind of runtime library.
IFF it's ok to compile a GPL program with any compiler of your choice, and distribute it, THEN it's also ok to exepack it with your exepacker of choice.
(starting another variant of this nonsense thread)
Aitor
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
