On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:18:42 +0100 LoneVVolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Looked at the code again, and it seems my code changes are unnecessary > so you can ignore those.
Glad that resolved itself while I was on the road. Note that the intent with this migration is to be very conservative. In my experience users do not like to have their home directory messed with (and they ignore the helpful messages that mention that it is happening:-). We should only be moving freecol data if all the tests pass for presence of the XDG directory skeleton. > The question is why freecol doesn't see my system as xdg-compliant, > although the fallback > directories for XDG_DATA_HOME & XDG_CACHE_HOME are present, and > XDG_CONFIG_HOME is set. You are in a better place to answer that than anyone else. Add a few trace prints to the code and tell us what is wrong. Cheers, Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
