On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:16:11 PM Joshua Lowe wrote: > We would like to submit the attached files as a solution to bug #2421 > The specification.xml is the specification for classic FreeCol.
...and it is still not based on the current trunk. Same as the last one. Guys, why do you keep doing this? Let me repeat what I said last time: />> The specification.xml is the specification for classic FreeCol./ > I fear this file is out of date. Is it perhaps from 0.10.7? You need to be > working from the trunk sources. A current solution would have > <production.../> elements in the building type. The mod/specification.xml > file also seems to use the old format. Here is another hint: - Your version contains the line: <!-- specification version 0.70 --> - Current trunk has: <freecol-specification id="classic" version="0.76"> Cheers, Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
