https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251046
Mark Johnston <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Status|New |Open --- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston <[email protected]> --- PRIV_IO access is not required only by /dev/io, it is also required for sysarch(I386_SET_IOPERM), which is otherwise available to jailed processes. So the patch definitely should not be committed. A better solution would be to extend pci(4) so that bhyve can use it to do everything required for PCI passthrough. Even then I'm not sure why it's useful to jail the bhyve process - what does it buy you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
