https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220024
--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5) Konstantin Belousov has reported on the lists that the mix of ino_t (64-bit) and 32-bit ino types should be fine for this ufs context, mostly due to ufs being limited to 32 bit inodes in the first place. So if the __udivddi3 is supplied so that the linking can complete for building boot1.elf via clang then the result should be okay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
