https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214258

--- Comment #10 from Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jan Beich (mail not working) from comment #9)
Why it should ?  The symbols like __divdc3 are referenced by a
compiler-generated code,  for instance the __divdc3 definition is
   complex double __divdc3 (double a, double b, double c, double d)
with the semantic of return ((a + i * b) / (c + i * d)), where i is imaginary
one.  The source code should contain complex division operation, not __divdc3
call, to get the reference.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to