On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:27:55PM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > On Sat Jan 1 11, Alexander Best wrote: > > On Sat Jan 1 11, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > > clang -O2 -pipe -march=native -fpic -fvisibility=hidden > > > > > -DVISIBILITY_HIDDEN -g -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers > > > > > -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c > > > > > /usr/subversion-src/lib/libcompiler_rt/../../contrib/compiler-rt/lib/mulvti3.c > > > > > detected CPU = core2 > > > > > Assertion failed: (getMinSignedBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for > > > > > int64_t"), function getSExtValue, file > > > > > /usr/subversion-src/lib/clang/libclangcodegen/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h, > > > > > line 1149. > > > > > Stack dump: > > > > > 0. Program arguments: > > > > > /usr/obj/usr/subversion-src/tmp/usr/bin/clang -cc1 -triple > > > > > x86_64-undermydesk-freebsd9.0 -S -disable-free -main-file-name > > > > > mulvti3.c -pic-level 1 -mdisable-fp-elim -mconstructor-aliases > > > > > -munwind-tables -target-cpu core2 -g -resource-dir > > > > > /usr/obj/usr/subversion-src/tmp/usr/lib/clang/2.8 -D > > > > > VISIBILITY_HIDDEN -O2 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k > > > > > -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -std=gnu99 -ferror-limit 19 > > > > > -fmessage-length 275 -fvisibility hidden -stack-protector 1 > > > > > -fgnu-runtime -fdiagnostics-show-option -fcolor-diagnostics -o > > > > > /tmp/cc-G6mPQL.s -x c > > > > > /usr/subversion-src/lib/libcompiler_rt/../../contrib/compiler-rt/lib/mulvti3.c > > > > > > > > > > 1. <eof> parser at end of file > > > > > 2. Code generation > > > > > clang: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal 6 (use -v > > > > > to see invocation) > > > > > *** Error code 250 > > > > > > > > > this is a genuine llvm bug it may have been (or may have been not) fixed > > > in recent llvm. > > > > > > if you feel like it - install llvm/clang from subversion and check if it > > > compiles this > > > ok. if it does not I think it's worth filing a bug in llvm bugzilla.. > > i just wanted to report that the latest clang version doesn't trigger the > assert any longer: > > clang version 2.9 (trunk 124571) > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0 > Thread model: posix > > is there a way to have the local "-fformat-extensions" clang additions pushed > upstream? maybe that mght be sufficient to compile the freebsd source with > clang 2.9+.
no, it makes no sense to push the printf patches upstream. it's freebsd kernel only. for compiling freebsd kernel you are supposed to use /usr/bin/clang (or just ignore the warnings from upstream clang) what are you trying to do anyway? :) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
