> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:09 AM Rodney W. Grimes < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Correct, this is ZFS only. And it's something we're using specific to > > FreeNAS / TrueOS, which is why I didn't originally mention it as apart of > > our CFT. > > > > Then please it is "CFT: FreeNAS/TrueOS pkg base, ZFS only", > > calling this FreeBSD pkg base when it is not was wrong, > > and miss leading. > > > > Sorry, I disagree. Which is fine.
> This pkg base is independent of the ZFS tool we're using > to wrangle boot-environments. Hence why it wasn't mentioned in the CFT. > These base packages work the same as existing in-tree pkg base on UFS, no > difference. If anything are probably safer due to being able to update all > of userland in single extract operation, so you don't have out of order > extraction of libc or some such. You missed the major string change and focused on the edge, No comment on calling iXsystems :stuff: FreeBSD instead of FreeNAS/TrueOS? That was the major point of my statement, your miss leading the user community, you yourself said this would never be imported into FreeBSD base, so I see no reason that it should be called "FreeBSD package Base", as it is not, that is a different project. > > > For UFS, there will need to be additional care taken when doing updates. > > > > > > -- > > > Kris Moore > > > Vice President of Engineering > > > iXsystems, Inc > > > Ph: (408) 943-4100 > > > Ph: (408) 943-4101 > > > The Groundbreaking TrueNAS M-Series - > > > Enterprise Storage & Servers Driven By Open Source > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Goran Meki? <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 9:43 AM > > > To: Kris Moore <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>; FreeBSD Stable < > > [email protected]>; FreeBSD Current <[email protected]>; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: CFT: FreeBSD Package Base > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:25:05AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote: > > > > We've written our own tool "sysutils/sysup" in GO which handles this. > > > > It performs updates using Boot-Environments to ensure that > > > > kernel/world are updated at same time. > > > > > > If I'm right, UFS doesn't support boot environments, so how would it > > work for UFS based installs? > > > > > > I personally feel GO is a bit ackward choice of language for something > > that practically should be part of base. At least I would expect OS > > update/upgrade not to require any external package. > > > > > > Regards, > > > meka > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > [email protected] mailing list > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > [email protected]" > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Rod Grimes > > [email protected] > > -- Rod Grimes [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
