On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think > that it > is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just > into the > vendor area and is not merged yet. > Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes sense. As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area but not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? Thanks Olivier > So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know > that > something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for > this job. > > And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a > perfect place > to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
