We have tried POLLING here on Intel cards attached to the igb driver (see my post entitled "High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance" from 27/01/2011".
This broke carp *badly* and we switched back to interrupts. You say a single thread eats up a full CPU core, can you post a top to show the %interrupt and your smb process' usage ? On 2/1/11 10:28 AM, Jack Vogel wrote: > I don't test POLLING, sounds like its broken, I don't understand > why you think you need you need it? This hardware supports > MSI why not use it? > > Jack > > > 2011/1/31 Lev Serebryakov <[email protected]> > >> Hello, Freebsd-stable. >> You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16: >> >>> And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver >>> this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but >>> seems, that problem is not fixed completely. >> I forgot to give one last pice of information: POLLING is in action. >> Without it single thread copy from this server via SMB eats one core >> of CPU completely. >> >> -- >> // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <[email protected]> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" >> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
