On 4/18/2010 4:24 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> By way of discussion, I'd just like to re-iterate what I
> said the first time around: it must be understood that this
> sort of thing is a (necessary) hacky-workaround that should
> ultimately be unnecessary.
While I find the discussion about launchd-type facilities interesting,
we have a real problem at the moment and now we have a real solution for it.
Jeremy, since no one has criticized your idea on a technical basis why
don't you run it by the -net and -rc lists to be sure that it's
technically sound, then I would be inclined to move forward with it.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
