----- Original Message -----
> From: Matthias Apitz <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013 12:01 AM
> Subject: Re: mount_smbfs in base?
>
> El día Saturday, June 01, 2013 a las 02:09:58AM +0800, Quark escribió:
>
>> is mount_smbfs, smbutil and friends part of base system? this is FreeBSD
> amd64 9.1-RELEASE
>
> $ which mount_smbfs
> /usr/sbin/mount_smbfs
> $ which smbutil
> /usr/bin/smbutil
I saw that, but suspected I must have done something stupid that those binaries
got placed there.
>
>> then what is extra in samba port?
>
> a SMB client and server
so this SMB client is recentish than what is in base?
I 'guess' samba was GPL, is it OK to let live GPL s/w in base when such strides
are being attempted to oust GCC?
>
> matthias
> --
> Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
>
> Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android
> E-mail: [email protected] | - Never being an iSlave
> WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments, no HTML/RTF in
> E-mail
> phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[email protected]"
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
