On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:12:14 +0200 > > Christian Barthel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I sniffed into AfterStep, fvwm2 and fluxbox (I don't want to use KDE). > I > > > think, fluxbox is a nice wm and for my future, it will be the default > wm > > > for me. It's also very fast and easy to configure. > > > > > > Are there any other window manager worth looking? > > > > > > What is your window manager? > > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox. > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox. > > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reason? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
