-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: << > I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since > the source in it is newer? >> end of "Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??" from E.S. <<
- -RELEASE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a specific point in time. In general, -STABLE is supposed to remain stable enough to be a -RELEASE at nearly any given point in time. Theoretically. Sortof. I have *never* had -STABLE not boot up for me, or cause the massive experimental problems that one might associate with -CURRENT. /Adam - -- Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE901+vo8KM2ULHQ/0RAqzxAKDEKa6dFXiSROZo/2A2VSgJNVap5gCfVwxh TuK0PF7SaZheEKxQlBwMmf4= =qaSQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
