On 2026-10-27 07:49, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 07:38:25AM +0100, Daniel Engberg wrote:
On 2026-10-27 07:31, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:33:56PM +0000, Robert Clausecker wrote:
Hi Jochen,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 08:55:28PM +0000, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
The branch main has been updated by joneum:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=eff6debb34a0080c5d926a43d6e886961143f181
commit eff6debb34a0080c5d926a43d6e886961143f181
Author: Jochen Neumeister <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: 2026-10-26 20:53:19 +0000
Commit: Jochen Neumeister <[email protected]>
CommitDate: 2026-10-26 20:54:12 +0000
x11/budgie: Restore to the tree
This reverts commit 6ea8a98a6540238635dd56b9ebecf3f3bacdeed6.
This reverts commit 09f8b7e01b7571a97dbc57eda4214f82b33e21da.
Only x11/budgie-desktop was broken, the other ports including
x11-wm/magpie were removed as its dependents. The build is fixed in
the following commit.
Sponsored by: Netzkommune GmbH
As these are now new ports, a maintainer is required.
Please seek assent from the old maintainer before adding him
back in (he seems to be absent) or add yourself as maintainer.
Do not restore the port with an absentee maintainer so that
the situation repeats in a year or two.
No, those are not new ports. Those are old ports that were removed by
mistake.
They're new in the sense that they're re-added and effectively unmaintained
which is what fuz is trying to convey.
And what I am saying is that it is not the case. Those ports were
removed by mistake, so their removal and unremoval is a noop.
Many people explained your mistake to you. They did it several times.
You do not seem to understand that you made a mistake.
Take a step back. Breathe. Read what I wrote in the other thread. Think
about it. Use that procedure in the future.
You're twisting the narrative and missing the point, them main port (not
meta) was listed as broken, and that was verified by core member and
others and it's a suite. You can read the rest in the other thread and
several have brought up shortcomings of policies. Additionally there's
already an ongoing discussion how to improve things overall. Why not
reflecting on it and how to improve the overall situation of the tree
and related polices?
Best regards,
Daniel
