On 10/27/26 09:03, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello there,
Hello.
We stayed on 4.16 because we had several issues on 4.20, 4.22
It would be useful to know which issues...
maybe we
should try to change the default version of samba to some version that
are more supported by samba team?
I totally agree.
What do you think ?
I've been running with 4.23 as default for several months: there are
some minor issues in corner cases (which I didn't report because I
didn't get to understand them fully yet).
Before I had 4.22 and 4.20 without any trouble.
I avoided staying on 4.16 exactly because it's deprecated.
bye
av.
