On Mon, Oct 26, 2026, 10:20 Daniel Engberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> The tree is not intended as a pile for broken ports. Feel tree to import > it in your overlay and keep it there, it's been listed as broken for 5+ > months and no one has even raised a PR about it missing or trying to fix > it. > > See also, > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#dads-deprecated > > Best regards, > Daniel > > On 2026-10-26 10:07, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> he branch main has been updated by diizzy: > >> > >> URL:https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/? > >> id=6ea8a98a6540238635dd56b9ebecf3f3bacdeed6 > >> > >> commit 6ea8a98a6540238635dd56b9ebecf3f3bacdeed6 > >> Author: Daniel Engberg<[email protected]> > >> AuthorDate: 2026-10-26 05:40:44 +0000 > >> Commit: Daniel Engberg<[email protected]> > >> CommitDate: 2026-10-26 06:34:32 +0000 > >> > >> x11/budgie: Remove from tree > >> Broken for more than 5 months in tree without any PRs submitted > >> Removes Budgie desktop and related ports > > > > > > I'd like to strongly express that I think this is not a proper way to > > manage the FreeBSD port tree in this case (especially in this case, not > > only though...). Why do rough? I guess this port could be resurrected and maintained by Harry right? :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
