> On 1. Sep 2019, at 18:07, bob prohaska <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 12:07:15PM +0200, Mika??l Urankar wrote:
>>>> openjdkd11 is not affected by this bug (and it's the 'mixed' mode
>>>> version), if you want to try it :
>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239246
>>>> you'll probably need #237054
>>> It's a happy thought, but openjdk11 seems to be amd64 and i386 only.
>>> I'm on aarch64.
>>>
>>> Thanks for writing!
>>
>> Support for jdk11/aarch64 has landed in the ports tree.
>
> When the present (likely futile) attempt to compile www/firefox ends
> I'll give jdk11 a try on aarch64.
>
> IIRC, www/chromium tried to compile java/openjdk8 as a dependency.
> Will having openjdk11 already built (before attempting www/chromium)
> satisfy the dependency requirement? If more intelligent intervention
> is needed please tell me how.
>
> Many thanks!
Not sure if it helps, but I had to build ports on the rPI3 last year and ended
up cross compiling on amd64. I wrote down what I did back then here:
https://blog.grem.de/sysadmin/FreeBSD-On-rpi3-With-crochet-2018-10-27-18-00.html
Best,
Michael
> bob prohaska
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
