Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively > On May 23, 2019, at 01:16, @lbutlr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie <[email protected]> wrote: >> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and >> dovecot2 package has remained stagnant. > > You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE. > > I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree matches the > current ports. > > Ah, yes, from the man -8 portsnap: > > extract Extract a ports tree, replacing existing files and > directories. NOTE: This will remove anything occupying the > location where files or directories are being extracted; in > particular, any changes made locally to the ports tree (for > example, adding new patches) will be silently obliterated. > > ===> > Only run this command to initialize your portsnap-maintained > ports tree for the first time, if you wish to start over > with a clean, completely unmodified tree, or if you wish to > extract a specific part of the tree (using the path option). > ===> > > -- > Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its > tendency to bend at the knees. --Feet of Clay > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
