On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:29 PM Steve Kargl <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:14:19PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Steve Kargl > > > > > > Doesn't matter what the python developer have done. > > > > Thanks, I see that you really appreciate my work... > > > > Your work is appreciated as much as my last 3 years of efforts > to get a trivially stupid patch acknowledged by python@freebsd. > > Why is it so harder for python@freebsd to do > > svn add files/patch-Modules___mathmodule.c > svn commit files/patch-Modules___mathmodule.c > FreeBSD has at least 4 active branches of Python, I gather (different "flavors" of one meta-port, lang/python, see https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/flavors-auto-python.html)). They are sufficiently different (at least Python 2.7 and Python 3.7 are sufficiently different to require different patches).
So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch. And https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 has just one patch attached. I am not sure how to create patches for flavored ports. Dima > ? > > -- > Steve _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
