On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:27:30AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Then the assertion that nothing in base needs libgcc_s.so is wrong? > > And, yes, if an application is currently using /lib/libgcc_s.so, > then it would need to be recompiled. When it is recompiled, it > can use libcompiler_rt or, if need be, it can use the libgcc_s.so > provided by a gcc port. This is the other name for 'breaking the ABI'. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1 Diane Bruce
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1 Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so... Russell L. Carter
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_... Steve Kargl
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_... Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Konstantin Belousov
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Steve Kargl
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Konstantin Belousov
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Steve Kargl
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Konstantin Belousov
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Konstantin Belousov
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Russell L. Carter
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Tijl Coosemans
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Dave Horsfall
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Steve Kargl
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Dima Pasechnik
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Diane Bruce
- Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//lib... Dima Pasechnik
