On 2018/05/18 16:32, John W. O'Brien wrote: > On 5/18/18 14:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >>>>>>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify >>>>>>> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored, >>>>>>> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is >>>>>>> customarily attributed. >> >>>>>> This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a >>>>>> patch to the ports handbook that describes it for maintainers >>>>>> and committers. >> >>>>> One thing to note: FreeBSD has a custom patch to subversion to detect >>>>> "ORGANIZATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default >>>>> template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places. >> >>>> How do you think I should handle that in my forthcoming doc patch? Is >>>> there a related bug I should file against services? >> >>> Its a client side patch of the subversion binary. I'm not sure the >>> best way to handle it beyond perhaps changing the template a bit? >> >> What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ? >> >> The custom patch is here: >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/subversion/files/extra-patch-fbsd-template?revision=411397&view=markup > > I agree that this won't necessarily need to change. If anything, a very > small reminder to committers, or suggestive wording change, to fix-up > the the sponsorship line when applicable. I will submit a separate bug > with a candidate change that depends on the doc bug. I won't mind if the > doc bug is accepted and the subversion portbug is closed WONTFIX upon > review. >
Patch away [1]!
[1] devel/subversion: Update "Sponsored by" microcopy in FBSD extra patch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/228362
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
