On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:24:22 +0800 Julian Elischer <[email protected]> wrote
> On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote: > > Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer: > >> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > >> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we > >> quickly formalise some nomenclature > >> or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing; > >> > >> I would like to propose the following possible "examples of official" > >> flavours: > >> -nodocs .. nearly every port has a DOCS option.. a way to > >> automatically turn it off globally and generate said pkgs would be good. > >> -minimal .. smallest possible feature set.. probably used just to > >> satisfy some stupid dependency. > >> -kitchensink .. speaks for itself .. options lit up like a christmas > >> tree > >> -runtime .. no .a files, include files, development > >> documentation or sources .. > >> might only contain a single libxx.so.N file, or a > >> single binary executable. > > No, these are no good examples for flavours, as I understand them ... > why not? > > that's part of the problem here. It's not really defined.. > sub packages? flavours? what's the difference? > It's not defined and a dozen examples would go a long way to help. > I know what I want.. that's to be able to populate my appliance > without all the stuff I don't need. > I also have a different requirement for my application build > environment. There I need all the includes etc. > How I get there is still a mystery. If I choose licorice flavor. Do I still get to choose between red, or black. If not, I'd like to request that black be the one chosen. IOW I see your point. I'm not really sure FLAVOR(S) are ready to land, just yet. Thanks for bringing this point up, Julian. :) --Chris > > > > > These are possible typical sub-package categories, or rather you could > > remove the DOCS from the base port, but offer a sub-package for them. > > > > > > I'd rather think that NO-X11 might become a typical flavour, or the > > dependency on a particular crypto library (e.g. openssl vs. libressl). > > > > > > Regards, STefan > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
