> On 9 Aug, 2017, at 15:08, Yasuhiro KIMURA <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear portmgr. > > Would you mind my asking your official opinion about new py3- port? > > When I submitted new mail/py3-authres port, it was rejected with > following comment: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220702#c2 > >> FYI, we no longer accept adding new py3- ports. FreeBSD will add >> flavored package support instead. > > But today I found new security/py3-ecdsa port is committed, which > conflicts with it. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=447640 > > I would like to make it clear because if new py3- port is permitted it > provides another solution to the problem about > mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python update. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 > > With best regards.
An exception does exist for when a py3 port is a required dependency, which it sounds like is the case here. Can you confirm that the current ports postfix-policyd-spf-python (1.3.2) fails on python 3.6? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger [email protected] https://www.adamw.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
