[Default] On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:33:50 +0000, Grzegorz Junka <[email protected]> wrote:
>we could >start small with a just a handful of ports in a stable LTS (Long Term >Support) branch. Develop processes around maintaining them, get some >feedback about the effort of applying only security fixes, then add more >ports as required or as viable from the resources point of view. How >does that sound? It sounds excellent, at least to me. How many platform roles are seen as fbsd's metier? Firewall? Already handled. Specialist workstations such as sound/video editing? Maybe. I don't know enough about that to have an opinion. Servers. No question. That's always been freebsd's best thing. The number of ports to build a server-of-all-work is not large. Unnecessarily complex and a source of uncontrolled errors, yes, but not really *large* qua large. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
