Le 23/01/2017 à 17:20, Jimmy Renner a écrit : > > Citerar Matthew Seaman <[email protected]>: > >> On 2017/01/23 15:26, Jimmy Renner wrote: >>> I might be totally off (and in the wrong forum) but I'm having problems >>> running the mumble version fetched by pkg, if I try to build the same >>> version in ports everything works fine. The failing one complains about >>> "unable to allocate SSL_CTX". The big difference I see is that the pkg >>> version is using /usr/lib/lbssl.so.8 and /lib/libcrypto.so.8 and the >>> ports version is using /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.9 and >>> /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.9. The odd thing is that both binaries are >>> reporting to be version OpenSSL 1.0.2j though the one depending on the >>> libs in /usr/lib says OpenSSL 1.0.2j-freebsd. >> >> What are the options settings for the instance of OpenSSL you built from >> ports? What version of SSL/TLS are you trying to use? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew > > I'm using the default options, however if I build the port and then > run "pkg upgrade" it wants to re-install mumble because "needed shared > library changed". I haven't specified any SSL version anywhere, should > I have? The port variant is the one working though. I would have > understood if the port variant didn't work but I can't do much about > the dependencies for the pre-built one from pkg, or can I?
The "default" does not mean much, as there still are ports that force installing the ports version of OpenSSL, do you have openssl, or libressl installed ? -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
