On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Matthew Seaman <[email protected]> wrote: > Why can't you have both flavoured and unflavoured variants of the same > port -- eg. devel/example as well as devel/example/foo and > devel/example/bar ?
It seems like it would make sense to allow devel/example to be a default flavor so that, for instantiated example, editors/vim-lite => editors/vim/lite and editors/vim could potentially be a 'full' flavor or unflavored, if that's your flavor. I personally learn towards default flavor, though, because that gives you a chance to be slightly more descriptive. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
