On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:18:51 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 04.10.2016 um 14:03 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:36:29 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Am 04.10.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: >>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:52:23 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> make clean fails to clean autoconf and automake. >>>>> >>>>> If a port uses autoconf and autoconf isn't installed on the system, it >>>>> will be build and installed. >>>>> >>>>> if you run make clean after installing the port, every dependency is >>>>> cleaned as well but not autoconf. >>>> >>>> Can you give an example of such a port, because we have two mechanisms >>>> that can pull in autoconf. >>> >>> It's seams to be quite a complex problem. >>> >>> To find out which ports causes this problem tried to build lang/php56 >>> which uses autoconf. But when I do a make clean autoconf is cleaned as >>> well. >>> >>> [root@etustar /usr/ports/lang/php56]# make clean >>> ===> Cleaning for autoconf-2.69_1 >>> ===> Cleaning for php56-5.6.25_1 >>> >>> But it also installs help2man, gmake, p5-Locale-gettext-1.06 and >>> autoconf-wrapper-20131203 and these are not cleaned. >>> >>> The transcript is attached as typescript_clean >>> >>> now do a pkg autoremove which removes autoconf and the missed ports form >>> the system. >>> >>> now try again to compile php56 and it fails >>> >>> the transcript is attached as typescript_unclean >>> >>> It seams that dependencies of dependencies are not clean. It seams that >>> autoconf was only the most memorable one. >> >> This seems to be intended. Make clean runs make limited-clean-depends >> which cleans direct dependencies only. If you want to do full recursive >> clean you have to run make clean-depends. > > I use FreeBSD since FreeBSD 2.2.5. When did this change in semantics > happen? Why do the first layer. This is something nobody can understand. > Either make clean should only clean the actual port. So everybody sees > that dependencies are not cleaned (maybe a message "You should run make > clean-depens to clean dependencies as well" should be printed if > dependencies are touched) or do it right and clean all touched. > > make clean-depends doesn't take that much more time than make clean, so > why the change?
I've filed a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213188 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
