Le 04/10/2016 à 14:03, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/04/2016 06:47 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : >>> On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : >>>>> Could we use USES=metaport to suppress these messages? >>>> Suppress what messages ? >>> 115 .if defined(LICENSE) >>> 119 .else >>> 120 DEV_WARNING+= "Please set LICENSE for this port" >>> 121 .endif >> Mmmm, this is a warning, not an error, it tells you "dude, maybe you >> need to do this". >> I don't see a good reason to complicate the logic more. >> > Because naive port maintainers like myself might think they should add a > LICENSE to any metaport they happen to own. > > One of the issues I have with LICENSE is that I don't see anything about > it in the porters handbook. Otherwise that would be an excellent place > to tell maintainers of metaports not to license them.
Nobody stepped up to write a LICENSE section. I started writing https://reviews.freebsd.org/D56 but it is crappy. > Also the tone is quite commanding. If it said "Consider setting LICENSE > for this port", that would be more acceptable. Really, I think it > should say "Please set LICENSE for this port, unless this is a metaport". Feel free to make the message better, it is in Mk/bsd.sanity.mk. -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
