Mathieu Arnold mat at FreeBSD.org wrote on Fri Jul 8 06:26:33 UTC 2016: > I will be changing the > default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to > security/openssl.
This could be odd for something like ports-mgmt/pkg if it currently uses the base system version: needing to have had already built security/openssl in order to build/use pkg. pkg tends to depend on the base system or have its own copies of things so that it is largely self contained --at lest that is my general understanding. I'm only using ports-mgmt/pkg as an illustration of an idea: I might be wrong about it using openssl for example. There might be other things besides ports-mgmt/pkg that might have such a relationship to the base system, sort of a bootstrapping issue. I'll note that I sometimes use powerpc and/or powerpc64 where source-based builds are required: no binary distributions are generally available for ports for them. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
