On 2016/03/11 12:04, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote on 03/11/2016 12:15: >> On 03/11/16 10:00, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> O. Hartmann wrote on 03/11/2016 10:42: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> The ABI is also unclear. Some documents say it is freebsd:10:x86:64 >>>> (which >>>> looks more the Intel/Linux dominated terminology) and also this one is >>>> considered correct: FreeBSD:10:amd64 (looks more FreeBSD'ish). It is >>>> said that >>>> the variable ABI is derived from "sh" - how? >>> >>> It is freebsd:10:x86:64. You can look at http://pkg.freebsd.org/ >>> The full URL is http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ >> >> Actually, ${ABI} *used* to be freebsd:10:x86:64. It changed to >> FreeBSD:10:amd64 quite some time and numerous releases of pkg(8) ago now. > > It's strange that it is not listed at mirror page > http://pkg.freebsd.org/ There are only old ABI formats.
Yeah. But that page also mentions packages for 8.x which is now well
out of support. I believe that the official package mirrors have been
set up to work with both variants of the ABI string, and the page you
reference simply hasn't been updated for a while.
Cheers,
Matthew
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
