On 28/10/2015 1:43 AM, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > Kubilay Kocak wrote: > >> Set merge-quarterly to ? in the bugzilla issue report, and ask (in a >> comment) for the committer who resolved it in ports HEAD to kindly merge >> it :) > > Thanks to you and Kurt Jaeger for the help. The committer in question has > now reassigned it to the security team so I'll wait and see what happens. > > Also thanks for the additional information Koobs.
You're welcome :) > This does leave me with one question: just when is it appropriate to set > the merge-quarterly flag? Apparently quarterly fallout is one example and > security fixes are another. But is there anything else? > > AvW > The real question that informs the decision is: Might/Do the people using the quarterly want/need this? Officially it's: Very well-tested build/run/security issues/fixes. Another way to look at it is: Not version updates (all else being equal). A really way to get a better feel is to browse the quarterly commit log: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2015Q4/?view=log However, if you're unsure, it's appropriate to set the merge-quarterly flag to ? *any time* you think that (or are not entirely sure whether) a change/issue may need to be committed to quarterly. Really. We'd rather quarterly become high value and deal with a few more issues that have the flag incorrectly set (and deny the request), than missing commits/fixes that go into head that should be merged, but aren't. If you have any more questions, head on over to #freebsd-ports on freenode or #bsdports on Efnet IRC and you can ask as many as you want :) ./koobs _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
