On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:11:32PM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > On Sunday 27 September 2015 10:04:40 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:21:49AM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > > > Hi, I'm using two versions of FreeBSD: 10.1 on my virtual server and 10.2 > > > on my home machines. On 10.1, pkg has updated to 1.6, but not on 10.2. Is > > > this the normal behavior? Is it going to update soon? > > > > Since 10.2 the releases now uses quarterly packages which are stable for 3 > > month. > > > > pkg 1.6 will be part of the next quarterly which will appear at the > > beginning of October. > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > Thank you for your kind reply. Here's another question: does portsnap now > fetch the ports from the quarterly branch? I just want my ports to be in sync > with my packages. To use the quarterly branch, I might fetch the ports via > svn > explicitly. Same with the latest one. But what's the default behavior for > portsnap now? Is it the same as it used to be? > I'm sorry but the answer so far is no :( I would love to see that happen.
Bapt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
