I have submitted a patch to add a port: biology/bcftools.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747
The port is dual licensed (MIT/GPL); however, If it is compiled with
option GPL, then some features are enabled with require it to be
licensed under GPL.
I've solved this by choosing to change the license if GPL is enabled:
LICENSE= MIT
[snip...]
.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGPL}
MAKE_ENV+= USE_GPL=1
LICENSE= GPLv3
.endif
However, I am not sure if this is the accepted way to specify the
license in this case. Does anyone have any other opinion?
--
Reed A. Cartwright, PhD
Barrett Honors Faculty
Assistant Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics
School of Life Sciences
Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics
The Biodesign Institute
Arizona State University
==================
Address: The Biodesign Institute, PO Box 875301, Tempe, AZ 85287-5301 USA
Packages: The Biodesign Institute, 1001 S. McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ
85287-5301 USA
Office: Biodesign A-224A, 1-480-965-9949
Website: http://cartwrig.ht/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
