On 03/07/15 16:14, Yuri wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528 Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing code to be c++11. As a result, many such packages can't be updated any more. In two days I hit this problem twice.
I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11 features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems. gcc5 is still buggy, but gcc49 is a pleasure to work with. I must be missing something, because if you want to support c++11, why wouldn't you require gcc49? What am I missing? I'm just trying to learn the ports philosophy here better. Best, Russell
Yuri _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
