On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's > ability to build legacy package repos?
No. Poudriere still supports it as long as you're using an older ports tree. > > Poudriere was able to build a legacy pkg_* repo from a snapshot of Ports > from around the time releng/10.0 received the patch for -p7, but it failed > to build a legacy repo from a snapshot taken today and instead built a > pkg(8) repo despite make.conf having WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes. > > Aside: Actually, it seemed to ignore the make.conf altogether as it > contains PERL_VERSION=5.14.4 and built 5.16 instead. It must be /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf > > Provided this is the case, what suggestions are there for patching today's > bash remote execution vulnerability[1] in a version of Ports that can be > built into a legacy repo? Just apply the patch via files/ and use EXTRA_PATCHES: http://dan.langille.org/2014/06/10/freebsd-custom-port-patches-when-using-poudriere/ > > [1] http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/650 > -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
