On 8/23/2014 2:14 PM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2014-08-23 20:16, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 8/23/2014 8:51 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> >>> Hello [email protected], >>> >>> Can you as the MAINTAINER of the port please clarify how one can build >>> this port on >>> >>> FreeBSD vm-tiny-r269739 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r269739M: >>> Fri Aug 15 18:07:41 CEST 2014 >>> guru@vm-tiny-r269739:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >>> >>> $ LANG=C svn info >>> Path: . >>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports >>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/java/eclipse >>> Relative URL: ^/head/java/eclipse >>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports >>> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 >>> Revision: 364388 >>> Node Kind: directory >>> Schedule: normal >>> Last Changed Author: marino >>> Last Changed Rev: 361589 >>> Last Changed Date: 2014-07-11 23:56:01 +0200 (Fri, 11 Jul 2014) >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> matthias >>> >>> ----- Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz <[email protected]> ----- >>> >>> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 09:19:10 +0200 >>> From: Matthias Apitz <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: building java/eclipse in HEAD w/ poudriere: >>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm building ports in HEAD with poudriere; java/eclipse is failing with >>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space >>> >>> I've already set in make.conf >>> >>> MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m" >>> >>> But tis does not help; the VM where poudriere is running has 4 GByte >>> memory and 4 GByte swap space. >>> >>> Any ideas? Thanks >>> >>> matthias >>> >> >> Once a solution is found we need it for java/openjdk* as well since they >> use all ram in the system. On our package builders this is 96GB. We need >> to be able to limit how much they can use for building so they only have >> a few GB and not 96. >> > > For FreeBSD >= 9.x rctl can be a solution to limit jail resources. > Unluckily it seems that RACCT/RCTL it not a default kernel option and also > not a loadable module ... > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security-resourcelimits.html#idp72352048 > >
Yes rctl is something I have considered adding into the build systems to integrate with poudriere. It would be perfect for this use. However it is not default because of the same reason I likely won't use it. It adds a lot of overhead with PROC_LOCKS. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
