Rainer Hurling wrote: >> So, is it permissible-although-undesirable to leave LICENSE unspecified? >> Or is there another recommended solution? > > One possibility could be > > LICENSE= GPLv2 LGPL21 > LICENSE_COMB= dual > > 'dual' means OR, 'multi' means AND, see Mk/bsd.licenses.mk
Okay, thanks! >> # portmaster x11-fonts/sgifonts >> still results in pkg-message being displayed twice. > > Hmm, I am not sure. But did you really need SUB_FILES=pkg-message ? I do think so, because pkg-message has to be "generated" dynamically from files/pkg-message.in due to %%PREFIX%% and %%FONTDIR%% having to be filled in. AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
pgpT9jZke5WAR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
