On 3/29/2014 14:25, Chris Rees wrote: > On 29 March 2014 11:01:04 GMT+00:00, John Marino > <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you may have success as far as dports is concerned if you > just disable it your end- there is a knob for that. > > If you think it's inherently bad, you should probably do so-- you > wouldn't hear complaints from dports users if you told them. Yes, I obviously can override whatever I wish but sweeping issues under the rug like this ultimately doesn't benefit me. It's yet more more "diff" that I have to maintain and have break on me. Now -- will FreeBSD ports committers set all tex ports to LPPL* for consistency and tell the FreeBSD users to build them from source as a consequence? I kind of think having no tex packages in binary form will go over like a lead balloon so I'm not really seeing how your suggestion benefits the FreeBSD community. I was trying to help resolve the problem for everyone, not just DF. John _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
