On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> In December, Nicola set the license for Arabtex to LPPL10. > >> The result is that the port is no longer packagable: > >> > >>> ====>> Ignoring arabic/arabtex: License LPPL10 needs confirmation, but > >> BATCH is defined > >>> build of /usr/ports/arabic/arabtex ended at Mon Mar 17 16:12:44 PDT > 2014 > >> > >> From a quick conversation on IRC, I got the idea that the license was > >> correct and many more Tex packages should also have this license. > >> If/when that happens, does that mean Tex packages are only to be built > >> from source? > >> > >> Is it correct that LPPL10 can't be built in a batch? > > No. You must accept the license before you can build the port, and you > cannot interactively accept a license in non-interactive batch mode. > > See the commments in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk for what to set in > make.conf to automatically accept certain licenses. > I have again looked over the LPPL and there is no language requiring explicit acceptance of the license that I can find. I see nothing about this more restrictive than LGPL or other standard licenses. Am I missing it? > -- > Fuzzy love, > -CyberLeo > Technical Administrator > CyberLeo.Net Webhosting > http://www.CyberLeo.Net > <[email protected]> > > Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ > -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
