Am Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:07:05 -0400 schrieb Adam McDougall <[email protected]>:
> In short, if you installed 10.0-RELEASE, don't pay any attention to > libiconv unless you are having specific problems. Do not try to fight > ports from using libiconv from ports, they are using that version for > a good reason. You don't really have a choice. Just relax and go > with the flow. Don't try to force things to use one or the other. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[email protected]" Thank you very much for clarifying this. I would have wished a similar clear statement in /usr/ports/UPDATING as I am obviously not the only one who is misinterpreting the base iconv role. But may be I am a bit too focused on migrating as I have just recently finish the necessary migration to databases/db5. And of course from time to time I have had some trouble in the past with broken ports dependencies worrying it might be the same with iconv :-). Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
