On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:57, Michael Gmelin <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that most ports build ok with clang, are there any steps planned > towards supporting C++11 and libc++ in the ports tree? I'm thinking of > flags like NEEDS_CPP98, NEEDS_CPP11 etc. With C++14 at the horizon I > expect more problems with ports depending on C++11 and even though > mixing standard libraries and language revisions might build in many > cases, it can lead to terrible problems at run time.
Aren't the Mozilla ports already doing something like this now? (See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Using_CXX_in_Mozilla_code for their specific needs.) -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
