On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> wrote: > We have to limit the number of compilers we do support, and given the > different > possible options people can have: CLANG_IS_CC WITHOUT_CLANG WITHOUT_GCC it > would > be a nightmare to support all combinaison.
Actually I was discussing another issue, that is: lang/clang33 doesn't provide c++11 features, according to the attached log. I'll try changing it to c++11-lib and see what happens, but I think c++11-lang should be enough. Am i wrong? -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
